Session aimContinue with tests and commissioning for MLControlGAM and dedicated vacuum pulses for Primary PF coil tests on Magnetis probes
Session day2025-05-29Operatorrhenriques
Session IDISTTOK_20250529_1Coordinatorrhenriques

Shot Time Operator Iplasma(kA) n(1018m-3) Duration (ms) Pre/post shot comments
529072025-05-29 18:06:49.627rhenriques-4.5518Repeat with adjustment on vertical field for Ip<0 | change in position not clear, mostly the same as in previous
529062025-05-29 18:01:05.927rhenriques-4.5518Repeat with 40 semi-cycles | Ip decreases towards the end, transistions not optimized
529052025-05-29 17:55:58.692rhenriques-4.64.118Repeat with 20 semi-cycles | OK, but transitions towards the end are not optimized
529042025-05-29 17:50:37.856rhenriques-4.65.318Plasma pulse for conditioning at maximum available plasma current (but not much higher than 4 kA), repeat 52761 (14 semi-cycles) | Impurity level seems to be lower than the reference already
529032025-05-29 17:43:12.854rhenriques1.32.726Repeat once more | Many failed pulses again, plasma may no long be resistive enough for this type of pulse
529022025-05-29 17:39:15.777rhenriques1.32.626Plasma pulse for conditioning at low Ip, repeat 52835 | Many failed semi-cycles
529012025-05-29 17:34:32.414rhenriques-4.74.926Repeat (3) 52837 to assess max Ip and wall conditioning | OK
529002025-05-29 17:30:35.281rhenriques-4.74.926Repeat (2) 52837 to assess max Ip and wall conditioning | Closer to 52858 but one cycle failed
528992025-05-29 17:26:02.98rhenriques44.226Repeat (1) 52837 to assess max Ip and wall conditioning | OK
528982025-05-29 17:16:32.844rhenriques000Repeat with capacitor bank at nominal voltage (240 V) and including IVert and IHorz | PF currents OK
528972025-05-29 17:11:11.337rhenriques000Repeat dryrun (52880) with lower bank voltage (100 V) to check everything is OK after the tests, Iprim only | Good
528962025-05-29 16:51:55.673rhenriques000Primary coils with configuration for Horizontal field, 200 A | Good
528952025-05-29 16:43:53.032rhenriques000Primary coils with configuration for Horizontal field, 200 A | Not enough bank voltage as current is not sustained
528942025-05-29 16:39:50.139rhenriques000Primary coils with configuration for Horizontal field, 150 A | Good
528932025-05-29 16:35:41.918rhenriques000Primary coils with configuration for Horizontal field, 100 A | Good, IGBT fully open by the end, need more voltage for higher current
528922025-05-29 16:31:33.01rhenriques000Repeat with 500 ms long | Good
528912025-05-29 16:27:12.117rhenriques000Primary coils with configuration for Horizontal field (lower coil with nominal direction and upper coil with opposite direction, decoupled from Iron core), 50 A, 100 ms | OK
528902025-05-29 16:04:31.833rhenriques000Upper primary coil only, 200 A | Good
528892025-05-29 16:00:33.556rhenriques000Upper primary coil only, 150 A | Good
528882025-05-29 15:56:33.591rhenriques000Upper primary coil only, 100 A | Good
528872025-05-29 15:48:49.382rhenriques000Upper primary coil only, 50 A | Good
528862025-05-29 15:34:23.538rhenriques000Repeat with 200 A | Good
528852025-05-29 15:29:19.527rhenriques000Repeat with 50 A | Good
528842025-05-29 15:25:21.49rhenriques000Repeat with 100 A (instead of 150 A) | Good
528832025-05-29 15:20:28.862rhenriques000Repeat with 500 ms long | Good
528822025-05-29 15:14:31.539rhenriques000Repeat with the lower primary coil only (single coil of 14 turns) | Good
528812025-05-29 14:54:37.388rhenriques000Special dryrun with Iprim only for calibration of Magnetic pickup coils, short waveform for initial testing (100 ms only), repeat 52370, bank: 80 V | Iprim did not reach request (IC not saturated yet)
528802025-05-29 14:32:02.479rhenriques000Repeat with lower capacitor bank voltage (from 260 to 80 V approximatley) | OK
528792025-05-29 14:27:06.364rhenriques000Dryrun (file: dryrun_standard_2025_04_04_52149.cfg) no TF, no Vertical and no Horizontal, Primary filed current only. Returning to previous ISTTOK MARTe version (without MLControlGAM) | OK
528782025-05-29 11:09:40.50rhenriques000Repeat with 250 hidden layers | MARTe constantly losing 2 packets (real-time of 100 us is now too short) MLControlGAM execution time is 58.6 us, ATCAAdcGAM with 96.9 us
528772025-05-29 11:04:46.256rhenriques000Repeat with 225 hidden layers | MLControlGAM execution time is 46.5 us, ATCAAdcGAM exec. time not clear to interpret as it oscillates a lot
528762025-05-29 11:00:48.859rhenriques000Repeat with 200 hidden layers | MLControlGAM execution time is 36.5 us, ATCAAdcGAM with 19.8 us
528752025-05-29 10:56:51.326rhenriques000Repeat with 175 hidden layers | MLControlGAM execution time is 29.1 us, ATCAAdcGAM with 27.9 us
528742025-05-29 10:52:45.218rhenriques000Repeat with 150 hidden layers | MLControlGAM execution time is 22.7 us, ATCAAdcGAM with 35.5 us
528732025-05-29 10:48:45.325rhenriques000Repeat with 125 hidden layers | MLControlGAM execution time is 15.3 us, ATCAAdcGAM with 43.6 us
528722025-05-29 10:44:21.713rhenriques000Repeat with correct MARTe real-time cylce (back to 100 us), assess minimum time required for ATCAAdcGAM to run | OK, ATCAAdcGAM still with about 50us available
528712025-05-29 10:38:43.247rhenriques000Test MLControlGAM with size of 100 hidden layers | OK, but real-time cycle of MARTe was still set to 150 us, GAM execution time 10.5 us